Home/Thematic Report Groups/International Criminal Law & Human Rights
EPIS Thinktank · Report Group

International Criminal Law & Human Rights

Biannual analysis of international criminal accountability, tribunal jurisprudence, and the enforcement of human rights law.

Published biannually · Peer-reviewed

5 articles
The UN Human Rights System Is Running Out of Money
Insight

The UN Human Rights System Is Running Out of Money

A view of the entrance to Palais Wilson in Geneva, Switzerland, previous headquarters of the United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights which was abandoned due to budgetary constrains. Photo by: Jean-Marc Ferré / U.N.

Mario Zirai · 1 Oct 2026 · 8 min read
Reframing human trafficking as a natural disaster outcome
Insight

Reframing human trafficking as a natural disaster outcome

Natural disasters create opportunities for trafficking in persons. While this is a well-documented issue, the international legal framework is not equiped to respond to these specific situations.

Virag Kelevitz · 1 Oct 2026 · 6 min read
Can the Pact on Migration and Asylum deliver a coherent asylum regime?
Migration

Can the Pact on Migration and Asylum deliver a coherent asylum regime?

The EU’s Pact on Migration and Asylum became applicable in June 2026, setting out to harmonise Europe’s asylum regime. A look at four Member States shows fractured legal implementation: secrecy in Greece, a legislative gap in Spain, federal hurdles in Germany, and outright non-compliance in Poland.

Julian Zrenner · 15 Sept 2026 · 21 min read
Human Dignity and Meaningful Control Under the EU AI Act
Human Rights

Human Dignity and Meaningful Control Under the EU AI Act

This article examines whether the human oversight obligations for high-risk systems under Article 14 of the EU AI Act effectively protect human dignity. It argues that formal compliance with these requirements is insufficient to prevent algorithmic objectification and ensure meaningful human cont…

ELIF SU COMERT · 11 Sept 2026 · 18 min read
The Gambia v. Myanmar: Reconciling Standards of Genocidal Intent
Genocidal Intent

The Gambia v. Myanmar: Reconciling Standards of Genocidal Intent

The Gambia v. Myanmar marks the third state-to-state genocide claim to reach the International Court of Justice, forcing the Court to rely on UN Fact-Finding Mission investigative material rather than prior criminal convictions.

Marius Huus-Hansen · 10 Sept 2026 · 15 min read
© 2026 EPIS · Independent · Non-partisan · Funded by the EPIS FellowsImprint · Privacy · · RSS

Privacy preference centre

When you visit a website, it may store or read information in your browser, mostly in the form of cookies. Choose below which categories we may use. Your choice is kept for 12 months, and you can change it here at any time. Privacy Policy

Manage consent preferences

Always active