Home/Working Groups/Europe/​The November 20 UK-EU Summit: Navigating ‘Made in Europe’ Barriers

​The November 20 UK-EU Summit: Navigating ‘Made in Europe’ Barriers

Protecting Bilateral Defence Integration Amid Rising Industrial Protectionism

EU flag flying atop a neoclassic government building
EU flag flying atop a neoclassic government buildingClassical architectural facade of a European governmental institution beneath the EU flag, representing continental policy-making and security governance
Key Insights

Preserving European security requires pragmatic procurement waivers for vital UK defence contractors.

PDF is being prepared
2 min read
Follow us on Google

Beyond ‘Made in Europe’: Keeping UK-EU Defence Integration Alive

The scheduled November 20 UK-EU summit arrives at a pivotal moment for European security architecture. In response to shifting global threat landscapes, the European Union has accelerated measures to strengthen its domestic defence base (EDTIB). Frameworks such as the European Defence Industry Programme (EDIP) and the Security Action for Europe (SAFE) instrument increasingly embed local-content mandates. While these initiatives aim to reduce reliance on external suppliers, their rigid ‘Made in Europe’ procurement requirements create substantial friction with non-EU partners, most notably the United Kingdom.​

The British defence sector remains deeply intertwined with continental supply chains, playing a vital role in joint research, air defence, and maritime capabilities. Excluding UK contractors from EU-funded joint procurement schemes threatens to disrupt existing supply lines, inflate unit costs through market fragmentation, and duplicate research efforts across Europe. Negotiators must therefore navigate a delicate balance: advancing European strategic autonomy without erecting barriers that undermine operational interoperability with London.

Why Pragmatic Flexibility Must Define the Future of European Security

​The policy debate surrounding EU strategic autonomy underscores a fundamental tension between industrial sovereignty and collective security. Strengthening Europe’s self-reliance is a legitimate operational goal, yet pursuing industrial protectionism at the expense of established cross-Channel integration risks weakening overall regional deterrence. The UK remains an indispensable security actor in Europe; fracturing industrial supply chains during a period of geopolitical instability yields disadvantage for both sides.

​The path forward requires pragmatic diplomatic flexibility during the summit negotiations. Rather than applying dogmatic local-content restrictions, the EU should establish targeted waiver mechanisms and third-country participation agreements for UK defence firms. Granting specific exemptions for strategic cross-border projects will allow Brussels to pursue its long-term industrial capability goals while preserving access to critical British technology and maintaining a unified Euro-Atlantic defence posture.

Roberto Papagno Political Science student at the University of Bari Aldo Moro. He graduated with honors from the High School 'G. Bianchi Dottula' and is passionate about politics, history, geopolitics, and international relations.

Cite this brief
Papagno, R. (2026). ​The November 20 UK-EU Summit: Navigating ‘Made in Europe’ Barriers. EPIS Insight · Europe.
© 2026 EPIS · Independent · Non-partisan · Funded by the EPIS FellowsImprint · Privacy · · RSS

Privacy preference centre

When you visit a website, it may store or read information in your browser, mostly in the form of cookies. Choose below which categories we may use. Your choice is kept for 12 months, and you can change it here at any time. Privacy Policy

Manage consent preferences

Always active