Home/Working Groups/Security Policy & Defence/Introduction to the Security Dilemma

Introduction to the Security Dilemma

A paradox that explains arms-buildup for a "safer" world

File photo
Photo · EPIS Archive
Key Insights

1. Why do we see increases in defense spending despite claims for peace? 2. In an anarchic world, peace is guaranteed by the state's actions, and higher military spending raises the costs for an aggressor. 3. Though paradoxical, the security dilemma may explain some of the recent increases in military spending

Download PDF
2 min read
Why does it look like states are preparing for war despite claims to seek peace? One explanation lies in the desire to deter threats and ensure national security - paradoxically fuelling insecurity.

How More Security Can Increase Insecurity

Thus arises the security dilemma! A militarily weak state faces greater risk from opportunistic neighbors. To deter other states from attacking, a state may strengthen its military to become a more difficult target. Yet, a state’s military buildup may be perceived as offensive preparation rather than defensive, thus incentivizing other states to increase their own military capabilities to deter stronger states.

What Is The Best Defence?

The security dilemma manifests itself in two ways: offensive and defensive buildup. States may increase their offensive military capabilities to deter others from attacking. A defining characteristic of war is reciprocity. If state A attacks state B, state A must concern itself with the potential retaliatory damage state B can inflict. As such, an increase in state B’s offensive capabilities may serve as a deterrent against potential attack by state A. Offensive development can also signal escalation or the desire to use military capabilities aggressively in the future, exacerbating the security dilemma.

Defensive buildup is also a manifestation of the security dilemma. If state A attacks state B, state A must concern itself with the feasibility of overcoming state B’s defences. State B can develop its defences to make it more difficult and costly for an aggressor to succeed, increasing state B’s security and solving its security dilemma. Defensive buildup does not necessarily signal aggressive intent, thus easing the security dilemma. However, both offensive and defensive buildup can exacerbate the security dilemma because they signal the desire to be prepared for conflict.

The Future of East-Asian Security

The security dilemma can partially explain defence budget increases in the APAC region, as states seek to deter others. Though paradoxical, increases in defence budgets signal a desire to guarantee territorial security in uncertain times. Even so, the security dilemma is only a piece of this very complex puzzle that goes beyond the region and extends into global security politics.

Further Reading Recommendation

Liff, A. P., & Ikenberry, J. (2014). Racing toward tragedy? China’s rise, military competition in the Asia Pacific, and the security dilemma. International Security, 39(2), 52-91. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24480583

Dominic Perfetti Dominic is currently pursuing a degree in War Studies at King’s College London, where he combines academic inquiry with a long-standing interest in geopolitics. His professional ambition is to work in intelligence analysis, with a focus on geopolitical risk. Through his studies and engagement with global security issues, Dominic is building a strong foundation for a career at the intersection of strategy, intelligence, and international affairs.

Cite this brief
Perfetti, D. (2025). Introduction to the Security Dilemma. EPIS Insight · Security Policy & Defence.
© 2026 EPIS · Independent · Non-partisan · Funded by the EPIS FellowsImprint · Privacy · RSS