The strategic importance of energy is clear – power is required for critical sectors such as transportation, manufacturing, agriculture, and healthcare. Even a temporary failure in the energy system can have devastating outcomes. Take the Texas power crisis as an example: infrastructure lacked winter flexibility, which led to power outages, leaving millions of households and businesses without heat and electricity. With hundreds of people losing their lives, the consequences of the incident are comparable to those of a moderate natural disaster.
Naturally, energy security is a high priority within European politics. To limit dependence on Russian fuels and achieve decarbonisation targets, the EU introduced the “REPowerEU” initiative. To date, the results have been largely positive: member states have substantially reduced consumption of Russian oil, gas, and coal. Simultaneously, power generation from renewable sources has expanded dramatically.
Despite its many merits, the energy transformation also introduces a new set of increasingly complex and interconnected issues. And, as always, the path to independence is lined with emerging risks and significant political challenges.
Variable generation – when producers have to pay
The introduction of renewables, particularly wind and solar, has created significant challenges for energy systems. Power generation from these sources depends heavily on the time of day and weather conditions – indeed, solar panels generate most power on sunny days, whereas wind turbines are effective primarily during winter months. In summary, unequal production leads to unequal supply. As a result, the system must continuously adjust to balance energy surpluses and deficiencies.
To avoid power outages when production is lacking, the shortage should be compensated on demand, e.g., through fast-response backup generation, or by importing the necessary amount from reserves and neighbouring grids. When energy production exceeds demand, however, energy prices fall below zero, forcing producers to pay grid operators and large consumers to utilise or store the excess energy.
Although negative energy prices are merely a natural consequence of the free-market dynamics – cost being determined by the supply-demand balance – they reveal a systemic challenge within the energy system – its inability to predict potential fluctuations and adjust accordingly. As the share of renewables in the European energy mix continues to rise, so will unpredictability around power generation. Therefore, energy transition demands a smart, flexible solution.
This structural instability is further compounded by market design flaws that penalise renewable energy developers during periods of overproduction while failing to incentivize rapid curtailment or dynamic demand-side response. When regional electricity grids experience extreme weather events—such as summer heatwaves driving solar production to record peaks alongside surging domestic cooling loads—the sheer volumetric mismatch risks triggering cascading grid trips if power flows cannot be instantly rerouted or absorbed. Without real-time automated balancing mechanisms across national borders, negative pricing periods act as a severe economic drain on green investments, threatening the long-term financial viability and bankability of unsubsidised renewable projects across the European continent. Furthermore, traditional baseload power plants, such as thermal or nuclear facilities, face mechanical wear and reduced operational efficiency when forced to ramp up and down rapidly to compensate for volatile renewable inputs, increasing overall operational maintenance costs across the power fleet. Consequently, electricity wholesale markets require structural reform to incentivize flexible capacity rather than purely volumetric output.
Grid resilience – a common sense response
The stability of a system is deeply intertwined with its resilience. Resilience – the capacity to accommodate rapid changes – rests on the three pillars: interconnectedness, tech-powered adaptability, and storage robustness.
Interconnectedness is self-explanatory: large grids connect more districts, power plants and storage facilities – thus having a higher chance of balancing the unequal power provisions. Cross-border high-voltage transmission corridors allow surplus wind energy from the North Sea to offset solar power deficits in Southern Europe, effectively smoothing localized weather variations across an entire continent and establishing a unified internal energy market.
Adaptability requires the application of corresponding technologies, which are able to predict fluctuations in power generation, learn from existing consumption patterns, and steer the energy production and redistribution in the right direction. Automated distribution management systems, paired with artificial intelligence and advanced machine-learning algorithms, enable utilities to perform predictive load forecasting, dynamic line rating, and automated redispatch before localized network congestion causes rolling blackouts.
Finally, secure storage is a vital element of any resilient energy system. The core principle is simple – saving excess electricity produced during peak hours and thus creating a safety net in case production becomes insufficient. Storage spans multiple operational timeframes, ranging from short-duration lithium-ion battery banks that manage sub-second grid frequency regulation to long-duration pumped hydro storage and emerging green hydrogen systems designed to bridge multi-week seasonal supply deficits during prolonged dark-calm periods (“Dunkelflaute”).
However, building and operating a reliable grid is impossible without numerous critical materials, technologies and components. In many cases, European nations still heavily rely on exports to cower the demand. Although legislative efforts are made to diversify the supply and increase domestic production (Critical Raw Materials Act), the scaling of environmental technologies has the potential to create new vulnerabilities. Moving away from fossil fuel import dependencies risks replacing geopolitical exposure to hydrocarbon cartels with strategic vulnerabilities to foreign mining monopolies and overseas processing bottlenecks.
Data is everything
Grid stability goes hand-in-hand with digitalisation, as technology is required to make accurate forecasts and guide production in an “intelligent” way. At the core of it are smart metering devices, which collect consumption data in real time and thus allow suppliers to plan accordingly – delivering only where and when it is needed. Industrial IoT sensors deployed along transmission lines provide operators with dynamic thermal ratings, allowing higher power throughput during cool, windy conditions.
A smart meter cannot operate without semiconductors. In the segment, several steps have been taken to encourage European production – including passing the European Chips Act and grounding ESMC joint venture. Furthermore, European companies such as ASML, Infineon do have a relatively strong position on a market. Nevertheless, dependence on global supply chains remains high – with TSMC (Taiwan) and NVIDIA (USA) remaining the leading manufacturers of semiconductors.
Given the current state of cross-strait relations, with China maintaining regular military activities around Taiwan, the likelihood of conflict escalation is on the rise. The persistent uncertainty surrounding the situation already impacts the supply chain, resulting in higher insurance premiums and shipping costs, as well as fuelling the cycle of export control measures between Beijing and Washington.
In a potential maritime blockade scenario, export disruptions are bound to severely impact various spheres, including telecommunications, AI and data centres, security and defence, and, last but not least, energy and mobility. In conclusion, while efficient, data-driven energy systems are vital for reducing energy dependencies, the pursuit of rapid “smartification” does bear risks of its own.
Beyond hardware supply bottlenecks, digitalized grids introduce severe cybersecurity vulnerabilities. As millions of internet-connected edge devices, smart inverters, and EV charging networks link to central distribution management platforms, the attack surface for hostile threat actors expands exponentially. A coordinated cyber breach targeting SCADA systems or smart meter communications software could maliciously manipulate demand profiles, trigger widespread voltage instability, or permanently damage physical substation hardware, paralyzing civil infrastructure without firing a single missile. Establishing sovereign encryption standards, robust firewall protections, and air-gapped emergency operating protocols is therefore as vital to European energy security as physical grid fortification. In addition, real-time data governance frameworks must ensure sensitive energy consumption data remains protected from hostile foreign intelligence oversight.
No storage – no security
Energy reserves provide a critical buffer when conventional production or supply is disrupted. However, the development of battery storage facilities requires a number of critical raw materials, particularly lithium, nickel, and cobalt. Although the continent is increasing its mining and manufacturing volumes, the processing capacities – converting the mined materials into high-purity chemical components – remain largely outsourced.
For instance, the EU extracts a fraction of its lithium “domestically” – primarily in Spain, Portugal, Germany and Finland; however, the mined concentrates are still exported for processing purposes. Hence, value creation, pricing power, and operational control remain outside European borders.
The leading market for chemical conversion is China, primarily through giants such as Ganfeng Lithium and Tianqi Lithium. Moreover, apart from processing, Beijing also dominates lithium and cobalt refining, as well as cathode and anode manufacturing.
In the case of nickel, domestic production is also insufficient. Around 400,000 tonnes annually enter Europe from abroad – primarily in the form of nickel sulphate, battery-grade intermediates, and Class 1 nickel. A significant share of these volumes originates from Indonesian mines and Asian refineries.
Likewise, cobalt dependency is evident across multiple stages of the value chain, with mining concentrated in Africa, above all DRC, and processing located primarily in Asia. Beyond these metals, synthetic and natural graphite represents another acute supply bottleneck, where Chinese export controls severely constrain European gigafactories from scaling domestic battery cell manufacturing independently.
Such reliance on exports, coupled with the widespread use of long-term offtake agreements and the dependence on external pricing benchmarks, does put a European consumer at a disadvantage. Given how crucial energy storage is for national security, geopolitical turbulences bear significant risks already at the rollout stage. Furthermore, financial market volatility surrounding battery metals complicates long-term capital allocation for European battery startup companies, who must compete against heavily subsidized foreign competitors operating under lower environmental and labor compliance costs. To bridge this competitive gap, European financial institutions must expand de-risking mechanisms, such as state-backed loan guarantees and long-term price floor contracts for critical battery chemistry inputs.
Bigger grids, lower risks
Finally, connecting new districts, renewable power generation sources, virtual power plants and storage facilities is impossible without the expansion and modernisation of the current electricity network. Expansion does not only entail the increase of the physical grid, but the installation of new transformers, solar inverters and other equipment. The urgency of such measures is widely recognised and demonstrated by the emergence of the EU’s Grid Action Plan, which aims to double cross-border transmission capacity. Europe is also a leading investor in domestic power transmission.
First and foremost, similar to the build-up of storage centres, the physical grid expansion requires large quantities of raw materials, primarily copper and aluminium. Copper imports especially highlight the scope of European dependency: the continent demands around 4 million tonnes yearly, whereas only around 1 million is mined domestically. Despite the relatively strong refining capacity of 1.2 – 1.5 million tonnes, as well as rapid growth and modernisation of the recycling infrastructure, the system demands a large-scale, continuous supply from external sources, with the demand covered primarily by Latin American countries. Although the domestic aluminium value chain exhibits a higher level of completion, Europe continues to rely on imports of 8 – 12 million tonnes of alumina and aluminium products each year.
Beyond raw materials, grid expansion requires power transformers – devices used to convert voltage levels and thus connect different segments of the power system. Although Italy leads European sales, China dominates the global transformer trade.
Furthermore, the demand for HDVC equipment is rising, given the rapid expansion of European offshore wind projects. High-Voltage Direct Current (HVDC) technology is indispensable for transmitting massive quantities of power across vast distances with minimal line losses, linking isolated offshore wind farms in the Baltic and North Seas directly to heavy industrial hubs inland.
The good news for Europe is that a big chunk of the energy transition technology is produced internally – primarily due to the operation of giants such as Hitachi Energy and Siemens. Nonetheless, some crucial components are still highly sourced “from the outside”. And, given the complexity of modern energy systems and interconnectedness of global supply chains, complete self-sufficiency may never be possible.
In addition to material bottlenecks, European transmission system operators (TSOs) face severe administrative, legal, and permitting hurdles that delay major cross-border infrastructure projects by up to a decade. Complex environmental impact assessments, legal challenges from local communities, and bureaucratic fragmentation across jurisdictions frequently stall overhead high-voltage transmission lines. This structural mismatch creates chronic internal grid congestion, where clean energy produced on northern coastlines cannot reach manufacturing regions in the south, forcing operators to pay exorbitant redispatch fees to curtail renewable power and activate fossil-fuel backup generators. Streamlining national permitting timelines through overarching EU statutory exemptions for critical energy infrastructure represents an essential prerequisite for unlocking grid expansion at scale.
Strategic pathways, policy trade-offs, and legislative responses
To mitigate these compounding risks and prevent structural vulnerabilities from derailing the energy transition, European policymakers have enacted robust legislative initiatives aimed at building systemic resilience. At the forefront is the Critical Raw Materials Act (CRMA), which establishes clear statutory benchmarks for 2030: extracting at least 10%, processing at least 40%, and recycling at least 25% of the Union’s annual consumption of strategic raw materials domestically. Crucially, the legislation mandates that no more than 65% of any single strategic material’s annual supply should originate from a single third country, compelling European industries to aggressively diversify their international supply contracts.
Achieving these ambitious goals demands a multi-tiered strategy that balances domestic industrial expansion with strategic foreign diplomacy. Domestically, European states must streamline permitting protocols for critical mining, refining, and recycling projects while maintaining strict environmental, social, and governance (ESG) standards. Public opposition can be addressed by offering local communities direct equity stakes or regional infrastructure benefits, transforming public perception of mining from an environmental nuisance into a localized economic asset.
Internationally, Europe must deploy proactive economic statecraft by forming Strategic Raw Material Partnerships with resource-rich nations in Latin America, Africa, Australia, and Central Asia. Rather than repeating historical models of pure raw material extraction, European investments should focus on building local processing capacities within partner nations, creating mutually beneficial economic ties that offer sustainable development for exporters while securing reliable intermediate inputs for European industries.
Simultaneously, scaling up circular economy infrastructure represents the most sustainable long-term hedge against primary resource scarcity. Advanced recycling technologies capable of recovering high-purity lithium, nickel, cobalt, copper, and rare earth elements from spent batteries, industrial scrap, and obsolete electronic devices can create a closed-loop domestic supply buffer. By combining public risk-sharing instruments—such as European sovereign funds, strategic stockpiling guarantees, and joint procurement platforms—with private sector capital, the EU can systematically reduce its import exposure and safeguard its energy transition against foreign geopolitical leverage.
Geopolitical statecraft, workforce scaling, and market integration
Beyond domestic industrial initiatives and raw material diversification, Europe must align its broader energy strategy with coherent geopolitical statecraft and structural labor reforms. The transition toward clean, decentralized energy networks requires active international diplomacy to ensure that external energy dependencies are managed through balanced, multi-vector coalitions rather than bilateral vulnerabilities. Establishing strategic energy corridors with neighboring regions, including North Africa and the Western Balkans, can facilitate reciprocal energy trade and expand clean hydrogen transport networks, bolstering regional stability while securing diversified power imports for European industrial centers.
Simultaneously, a critical yet frequently overlooked bottleneck in scaling European energy infrastructure is the acute shortage of specialized industrial labor. Deploying high-voltage transmission networks, installing advanced battery energy storage systems, and operating gigafactories requires hundreds of thousands of qualified electrical engineers, grid technicians, and chemical processing specialists. Without dedicated public vocational training programs, cross-border professional qualification recognition, and targeted labor migration policies, technical workforce shortages risk delaying project execution timelines as severely as material scarcity or permitting delays.
At the same time, internal market reform within the European Union must keep pace with technological expansion. Regulators must continuously modernize market rules to reward grid flexibility, dynamic demand-side management, and localized battery storage deployment. Eliminating regulatory barriers that restrict virtual power plants from participating in capacity markets can unlock substantial latent flexibility within existing industrial and residential loads, easing pressure on high-voltage transmission networks. By pairing market-based flexibility incentives and labor force expansion with targeted infrastructure investments, Europe can foster an agile energy ecosystem capable of accommodating higher shares of variable renewable generation without compromising economic competitiveness, social cohesion, or grid stability.
Conclusion – no “safe” approach
Despite the many merits of flexible energy systems, the path toward greater energy independence will create new vulnerabilities. The key to a successful energy transition requires companies to continuously explore supply security measures – such as acquiring equity stakes in key producers, forming strategic partnerships, and entering joint ventures across critical segments of the value chain. Additionally, further build-up of recycling capacities will result in more efficient, sustainable material use.
After all, there is no risk-free solution to a complex problem of adapting the energy system to meet the demands of the future. Still, the persistent will of European policymakers to diversify supply and secure critical materials already steers the process in the right direction.
Sources
Agora Energiewende. (n.d.). How is Germany increasing flexibility in the power system? https://www.agora-energiewende.org/about-us/the-german-energiewende/how-is-germany-increasing-flexibility-in-the-power-system
Agora Energiewende. (2014). Negative electricity prices: Causes and consequences [PDF]. https://www.agora-energiewende.de/fileadmin/Projekte/2013/Agora_Negative_Electricity_Prices_Web.pdf
Agora Energiewende. (2026). Warum der geplante Redispatch-Vorbehalt für Erneuerbare die Energiewende ausbremst. https://www.agora-energiewende.de/aktuelles/warum-der-geplante-redispatch-vorbehalt-fuer-erneuerbare-die-energiewende-ausbremst
CompaniesMarketCap. (n.d.). Largest semiconductor companies by market capitalization. https://companiesmarketcap.com/semiconductors/largest-semiconductor-companies-by-market-cap/
European Aluminium. (n.d.). Aluminium industry. https://european-aluminium.eu/about-aluminium/aluminium-industry/
European Commission. (2023). Commission adopts EU action plan for grids. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_23_6044
European Commission. (n.d.). REPowerEU. https://commission.europa.eu/topics/energy/repowereu_en
Euronews. (2024, May 9). Critical raw materials: Lithium. https://www.euronews.com/2024/05/09/critical-raw-materials-lithium
International Energy Agency. (2023). Building the future transmission grid. https://www.iea.org/reports/building-the-future-transmission-grid
Leipzig University. (n.d.). Energy fundamentals: Electricity transmission. https://home.uni-leipzig.de/energy/energy-fundamentals/22.htm
Mining SEE. (2026). Europe’s battery materials gap: Processing shortfalls, import dependence and trading exposure. https://www.miningsee.eu/europes-battery-materials-gap-processing-shortfalls-import-dependence-and-trading-exposure/
Mining SEE. (2026). Europe’s raw materials reality in 2025: Quantified dependence and the hard mathematics of industrial survival. https://www.miningsee.eu/europes-raw-materials-reality-in-2025-quantified-dependence-and-the-hard-mathematics-of-industrial-survival/
Science|Business. (2026). US creates tech alliance to secure AI supply chain without EU. https://sciencebusiness.net/news/international-news/us-creates-tech-alliance-secure-ai-supply-chain-without-eu
The Guardian. (2025, February 26). Homegrown Swedish battery startup admits importing vital components. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2025/feb/26/homegrown-swedish-battery-startup-admits-importing-vital-components
Three Gimbals. (2025). Chinese telecommunications infrastructure in Europe: Security risks, geopolitical challenges and policy strategies. http://3gimbals.com/insights/chinese-telecommunications-infrastructure-in-europe-security-risks-geopolitical-challenges-and-policy-strategies/
Yang, Y., et al. (2025). Securing the supply of graphite for batteries. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2503.21521
