/Flawed Agreements and Unkept Promises/Human Rights & Humanitarian Aid/Working GroupsHome

Flawed Agreements and Unkept Promises

Failed Ceasefire and ongoing humanitarian crisis in the DRC

File photo
Photo · EPIS Archive
Key Insights

1. Was the Rwanda-DRC ceasefire agreement effective in ending humanitarian struggles in the eastern DRC? 2. The ceasefire was not effective since it did not include non-state militias which are actively present in the region and are pursuing violence against civilians. 3. Civilians continue to die predominantly at the hands of non-state militias. Additionally, Rwanda was not actively involved in reaching peace, while the DRC did not try to ameliorate the livelihood of civilians.

Download PDF
3 min read
"The 2024 ceasefire between Rwanda and the DRC failed to stabilize the region because it ignored the aggression of non-state militias, who remain the primary culprits for the killing and displacement of over 7 million people."

Main point: Ceasefire does not change the situation on the ground, that is actually controlled by powerful non-state militias; innocent people are still killed or actively displaced or exploited

One of the most prevalent humanitarian crises of this decade is happening in the east of the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) right now. More than 7 million people are internally displaced, killed and exploited because of the ongoing violence in the region. While the DRC and Rwanda might have initially agreed on a ceasefire compromise, from which they have later withdrawn, the authors of this article believe that it is not the aggression of state armies that fuels this humanitarian crisis, but the aggression of non-state militias, which are not part of the ceasefire agreement.

In July 2024, Rwanda and the DRC agreed to momentarily halt aggressions against each other and to implement ad-hoc verification mechanisms. They were to ensure that Rwanda would withdraw its troops from the DRC and that the DRC would stop supporting the Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda (FDLR). Given the absence of Rwandan experts in the verification mechanism, this ceasefire was bound to fail. And it did, less than five months after.

Thus, has the ceasefire made any difference on the ground? At least 427 people were killed by armed groups in the DRC (Actualité). The main culprits: non-state militias.

The violence mostly happened in the North Kivu province, on the eastern border of the DRC, in the cities of Kirumba, Kaseghe, and Katwa.

What are these non-state militias, and who do they fight for?

A self-styled independent armed group, Mouvement du 23 mars (M23). M23 fights to protect Congolese Tutsis rights and lands against the Congolese government. Although Rwanda denies supporting M23, satellite imagery proves otherwise (De Groof et al., 2023).

Originally a peaceful agricultural cooperative, the Coopérative pour le Développement du Congo evolved into an armed rebel force. The movement was reorganised multiple times under different leaders. Over time, it became looser and less coherent. Today, it is among others referred to as a political-military sect.

Wazalendo

The Wazalendo phenomenon gathers multiple local militias that rally around the flag of patriotism. They fight for support of the Armed Forces of the Democratic Republic of Congo (FARDC) and recognition by the DRC government. Many Wazalendo movements have taken advantage of the DRC’s fight against the M23 to conduct criminal activities, such as illicit mining (De Groof et al., 2023).

The ADF operates on the border between the North Kivu province and Uganda and repeatedly attacks Uganda over vague claims of discrimination against the Ugandan Islamic community (Titeca & Vlassenroot, 2012). Its exact fighting motives are difficult to gauge, but the pattern of attacks cements it as an anti-Ugandan rebel group.

Congolese Hutu militias (Mai-Mai, Nyatura, & FDLR)

These militias are primarily composed of Rwandan Hutus, including some responsible for the 1994 Rwandan Genocide. They fled to the DRC to escape prosecution for the genocide in Rwanda. Their goal is to resist Rwandan authority and protect Hutu minority in the DRC, which involves violence and exploitation of Congolese citizens.

Julia Konarzewska Julia Konarzewska is a third-year BSc Political Sciences: International Relations and Organisations student at Leiden University in The Hague. She is keen on diplomacy, international security, the European Union, the dynamics of the Middle East, and the overall power structure within the broad subject of geopolitics. Julia is a former intern in the Political Affairs department at the Polish Embassy in Paris and she is cooperating with Global Weekly, a geopolitical research agency, as an editor.

Denisa Cepoiu Denisa Cepoiu is an MA candidate in International Relations (IR) at Central European University in Vienna and a cum laude IR graduate from Leiden University. Her work centres on security issues through either a constructivist or a critical realist lens. She has researched wartime propaganda, the security crisis in the DRC, and narratives around anti-corruption protests in Romania. Her current research focus is on populism, political violence, and Russian foreign policy.

Cite this brief
Konarzewska, J., Cepoiu, D. (2024). Flawed Agreements and Unkept Promises. EPIS Insight · Human Rights & Humanitarian Aid.
© 2026 EPIS · Independent · Non-partisan · Funded by the EPIS FellowsImprint · Privacy · RSS